Following Yolanda EducaRueca (Thank you, Yolanda admired friend!) 've seen this video:
Al I remembered seeing the essential text of León Felipe, "But, why do speaks so loudly in English?" and I are giving high like talking : " Here comes the wolf The wolf is coming!"
guess this is a minority opinion, but I think it should be noted some hazards.
In practice, freedom of Esperanza Aguirre speaks in the video is the center to put curricula that do not fit poor, and encourage unhealthy competition for schools and teachers, instead of cooperating and distributed loads, are given elbowing each other and humble themselves before the administration seeking favorable treatment compared to their fellow neighbors.
The right of parents to choose center takes practicing in Spain for more than thirty years. The problem is that the right of choice of school is a right concurrently, which is to set priorities to determine who has better right in the case where two Porson who want the same school place. The LOE regulates the right of parental choice in Article 84.
If our concern is to reduce costs, get on a list or please the partitioning of good programs, what will become of poor students, who create trouble and expense? What will become of the families disoriented?, What teachers will be generous with social vocation?, What will the public service of education?, Where is the commitment of schools to community development?, What site will have to compensatory education?, Where will go to social cohesion?
not new neo-liberal strategy to break the unity of the education system. The key to this strategy is the differentiation of curricula for schools and, in the future (if no one remedy) in a variety, in fact, degrees in the basic teachings. If we add a tad of authoritarianism, to solve problems without having to study teaching, the better.
Competition in education is the risk of promoting exclusion, lack of solidarity and traps. Arguably improve overall yields.
In summary, we believe very dangerous combination of what they call "free choice" with covert selective access based on different curricula and hostility, veiled or explicit, to people with an expected low academic performance or cost above average.
Thus it is inevitable that the creation of a dual network (the good and the bad). The first, more protected and sanctioned, and the second increasing poor and marginalized. We are already seeing. These policies in place: the bilingual programs, centers of excellence, centers classifications based on the CDI, the directors submissive black lists, closing Teacher Centers, where cooperation, etc. Are gradually abandoning the policy of "success for all" as BOW. Did not anybody see where we walk?
collateral Another danger is that, in parallel, is flawed to the mentality of officers in the sense of public service . How: the arbitrariness in the distribution of jobs, the control of all middle managers and the encouragement of unhealthy competition between colleagues. A humiliated person, loss of dignity, it discourages and becomes submissive and uncritical.
This is very easy for the general objectives of the references are no longer acting to be guided only by the particular accommodation and thrive.
.............................................. ....................................
a historical curiosity, perhaps people only remember the older ones: In its day, in the eighties, prioritize the proximity of home on the right of parents to the school choice was a request schools in posh neighborhoods for people not to come from other neighborhoods with less social status. It is true that times were different.
................................................ ...............................
This video gives the feeling that the boss has put in a Embolao not know where to go and is improvising:
0 comments:
Post a Comment